laying
Politics" - that's what they claim. Listen to many of
the voices of the far right talkshow hosts on radio. Question, criticize
or even suggest better ways to handle the true disaster faced by
so many hundreds of thousands of the people of New Orleans and elsewhere
in Louisiana and Mississippi, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
and, by their estimation, you must be some left wing jerk who hates
this country. They'll claim you have "an agenda" (That's
something that most Democrats have in their
attempt to lead this country astray). Nonsense, dishonest and ignorant,
but that's what turns on their dwindling audiences. I'd like your
reaction to this thought; if we had any other form of government,
Bush would by now have been ousted from office. The senior members
of his party would have told him to step aside. We have a chief
executive who, early on, claimed that he was "satisfied with
the response" his administration had made to Hurricane Katrina.
He praised the utterly inept head of FEMA, Michael Brown. Brown said
that Katrina was a category 4 hurricane that "caused the same
kind of damage that we anticipated. So we planned for it 2 years
ago." It certainly hasn't appeared that they had done the correct
planning for this category 5 event.
Go
back just a few years to the Clinton administration when
the Federal Emergency Management Agency was run by James
Lee Witt. It was he who said "In the 1990s, in planning
for a New Orleans nightmare scenario, the federal government
figured it would pre-deploy nearby ships with pumps to
remove water from the below-sea-level city and have hospital
ships nearby. These things need to be planned and prepared
for; it just doesn't look like it was."
The
endless list of FEMA's failings is in no way intended to criticize
the invaluable and heroic work of the individuals for whom this is
their life's work.
But,
the leadership!
Some
examples.
Wal-Mart
delivered trailer trucks of water. FEMA turned them back claiming
they were not needed.
FEMA
decided to stop the Red Cross from sending in supplies and medical
personnel into New Orleans.
There
was not one busload of refugees bused out of the City of New Orleans,
or the state of Louisiana before Hurricane Katrina hit.
The
list can be almost without end, but to give you just a couple more
examples of the government's bureaucratic foul-up. When Mayor Richard
Daley of Chicago offered help to FEMA before the hurricane, they
said "No."
During
the presidential debates of 2000, George W. Bush told his opponent,
Al Gore, that natural catastrophes are "a time to test your
mettle."
If
you look at the first five days subsequent to the onset of
the hurricane on the Gulf Coast, he was tested and failed
in most all respects. Perhaps you watched him being interviewed
by Diane Sawyer on "Good Morning America"; he appeared
ill-informed and almost flippant with some of his answers.
They
are just beginning to get it - to understand. What do you say
to a man like Michael Chertoff, the head of the Department
of Homeland Security, who said that the disaster "exceeded
the foresight of the planners and maybe anybody's foresight." What
nonsense.
On
9/11 four years ago, most will accept the fact that George
W. Bush emerged from the attacks with very high poll ratings
for his leadership and decisiveness. Not this time. His speeches
have been lackluster and uninspiring. When the terrorists attacked,
Bush was slow to react and he was portrayed as weak and indecisive.
But once he got to ground-zero in Manhattan that was
where he made his mark. He still has time in his second term
to restore his stature... but I very much doubt he has what
it takes.
I'd
love to be a fly on the wall, say, three months from now when
at the cabinet level they ponder such questions as "what
do we wish we had done."
It
has been arranged that, barring some new urgency, one of
the people I'll be interviewing tomorrow is James Lee
Witt, the former much respected leader of FEMA. He's right
there on the ground in Louisiana.