phrase
the president repeated seven times during his annual State of the Union
address framed much of his domestic agenda; "keeping America competitive." He
laid out his goals for healthcare, energy, scientific research, education
and immigration. He warned against isolationism, urged us to stay the
course in Iraq and called for expanded research into alternative energy
sources - He told the nation what we already have known for years; "America
is addicted to oil."
It
has been a tough year for the Chief Executive. Since his
last State of the Union address, which came after his victory
at the polls for a second term and his inauguration, Mr.
Bush had his worst year in office. There was his most
unsuccessful campaign to reform social security, a slow and
somewhat inept response to hurricane Katrina and the increasingly
unpopular war in Iraq. He is, it would appear, a humbled
man.
The Democrats, in their response, introduced the newly elected governor
of Vermont, Tim Kaine who put it in a nutshell when he criticized the
administration for what he called "poor choices and bad management," including
the administration's persistence in cutting taxes at a time of growing
deficits and a costly continuing war.
Rep.
Tom Cole the Oklahoma Republican issued some sound and effective
advice for the Democrats when he said "You don't beat
ideas with no ideas. The president is willing to put his
ideas out there. Democrats have failed to do that. They are
using corruption to make up for the ideas they know can't
win with the electorate." Altogether the presidential
address demonstrated that we have anything but a bold leader
with grand ideas. We have leadership transfixed by the up-coming
Congressional elections. They certainly don't want to see
the Democrats taking their Republican majority in both houses.
Second
term presidents frequently turn more toward
foreign policy. Aside from the War on Terror
and the insurgency continuing in Iraq we have
a president who is more pressured to attend to
the domestic needs of the country, but it will
be tough as he has less room to operate and less
money to spend.
How
different the president's approach to certain
foreign policy situations than heretofore. Compare
Mr. Bush's January 2003 address, which made the
case for confronting Saddam Hussein's Iraq - with
Iran, today, in contrast to the earlier confrontational
tone that Mr. Bush made, he made no direct threats
to Iran, despite the fact that Iran is in all
likelihood seeking a nuclear arsenal and the
Iranians surely have great potential for making
our lives very difficult in Iran.
The
president still has a full three years left in
the White House and he can still turn things
around. But, by almost any measure, Mr.
Bush's options are far more limited than they
were just one year ago.
And
a thought, Mr. President remember how you spoke
with derision of your predecessor's incessant
talk of remaking the work force to meet the challenges
of a global economy? Now we hear you uttering
the same thoughts when you "encourage children
to take more math and science," and show
concern for the rising economies of India and
China.
Yes,
we are five years into your administration and
leadership. No, I don't think any of us are better
off than we were or feeling more secure.