
upport
for a war by the American public depends on whether we think it will
succeed. If the public senses that we cannot succeed then casualties
on the battle field matter a great deal. The public needs more than
rousing speeches by the president to believe in eventual victory.
In his most recent address to the nation, President Bush used the
word "Victory" about a dozen times and referred to "complete
Victory." What does that mean and how will we know when it has
been achieved? There are many of us who wonder if, when we leave
Iraq, possibly years after Mr. Bush has left the White House, whether
it will be a safer, better country. The Christian Science Monitor
pointed out that in W's address on the training of Iraqi forces he
used the word "Victory" 15 times. There is a growing consensus
in Congress that this White House must more clearly define what constitutes
victory. It is a powerful word and this administration may have set
themselves a dauntingly high goal.
When
the president recently addressed the Council on Foreign
Relations he repeated "We will accept nothing less
than complete victory." He said that U.S. victory
will be achieved when Saddamists and terrorists can no
longer threaten Iraq's democracy, and when Iraq is not
a safe haven for terrorists to plot against the U.S. If
what we are told by the administration doesn't match what's
happening on the ground, then the rhetoric will not be
accepted.
Bush,
Cheney, Rice, Rove, Rumsfeld and most of their high-ranking
administration colleagues have no first-hand experience of
warfare and the messy business of the termination of military
hostilities.
They
got us into this war and the president has, on many occasions,
referred to himself as "the war president." Maybe
he'll find a way to be "the peace president." Two
thousand two hundred fatalities and growing. Fifteen thousand
and more wounded. Whether one aggress with Rep. John Murtha's
call for the with the withdrawal of US troops in Iraq or
not, he has roiled both parties on the war and intensified
a debate that is soon going to be beyond the ability of the
party leaders to control.